Hi!
I’m evaluating Aspose.Words and Aspose.Slides for converting Office documents to PDF. Are there differences between the quality, performance or frequency of releases between the .NET and C++ on-premise versions of these libraries for Linux? Would you recommend one over the other in certain circumstances?
Thanks in advance for any advice!
@stephan,
Thank you for posting the questions.
Aspose libraries are released for C++ as regularly as they are for .NET. I added a ticket with ID SLIDESCPP-3346 in our issue tracking system for Aspose.Slides. We will reply to you as soon as possible about the quality and performance differences between the C++ and .NET versions.
Documents:
Aspose.Slides for .NET
Aspose.Slides for C++
You can also get the Temporary License and evaluate these versions yourself.
Our support team will answer you about Aspose.Words further.
@stephan,
Aspose.Slides development team investigated your questions. If we are talking about Linux, Aspose.Slides for C++ is definitely more stable and predictable because it is prepared and tested specifically for Linux, as opposed to the universal .NET version.
@Andrey_Potapov Thank for very much for the fast replies!
Your colleague writes that for Aspose.Words the primary development target is .NET and then the code is ported to C++ afterwards. Is that also true for Aspose.Slides?
@stephan,
It is also true for Aspose.Slides. Aspose.Sides for .NET is ported to other platforms but according to our developers Aspose.Slides for C++ Linux releases are optimized specifically for Linux.
Thanks a lot!